Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2633 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 287% better in League of Legends than FX-6350 - 232 vs 60 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 32 vs 6 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€1055.1
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,055.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |