Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 2640 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $73.11 vs $131.6
- Up to 38% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $0.41 vs $0.66 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 13% better in Borderlands 3 than FX-6350 - 222 vs 197 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
197
88.73873873873875%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2689 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
62.12121212121211%
Price, €
€146.08
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2696 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Renoir |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | No |