Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1316 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 14% better in Minecraft than FX-6300 - 683 vs 600 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than FX-6300 - $75.31 vs $93.62
- Up to 29% better value when playing Minecraft than FX-6300 - $0.12 vs $0.17 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €103.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
683
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€83.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €83.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |