Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $93.62 vs $658.06
- Up to 84% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-13400F - $0.55 vs $3.34 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-6300 - 219 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €103.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.34/FPS
16%
Price, €
€730.45
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |