Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2373 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $54.14 vs $87.75
- Up to 35% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-9100F - $0.4 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6300 - 158 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €60.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |