Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $42.44 vs $239.04
- Up to 79% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 9 7900X - $0.21 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-6300 - 263 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
229
87.07224334600761%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€47.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €47.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
20.792079207920793%
Price, €
€265.33
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €265.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |