Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $54.14 vs $60.68
- Up to 4% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 5 3600 - $0.47 vs $0.49 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6300 - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €60.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2941 minutes ago
Buy for €67.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2942 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |