Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2004 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $54.14 vs $135.27
- Up to 51% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 5 2600X - $0.39 vs $0.8 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 22% better in Rust than FX-6300 - 188 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €60.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |