Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7500T outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7500T is 1772 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - $31.32 vs $49.45
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 95% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-6200 - 43 vs 22 FPS
- Up to 19% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-6200 - $1.28 vs $1.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
43
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€54.89
63%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €54.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |