Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3305 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $31.32 vs $99.8
- Up to 62% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-11400 - $0.45 vs $1.19 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 19% better in Remnant II than FX-6200 - 93 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 287 minutes ago
Buy for €110.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |