Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1772 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - $31.32 vs $45.33
- Up to 27% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i3-7100 - $0.16 vs $0.22 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 6% better in Fortnite than FX-6200 - 224 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 51 vs 125 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Buy for €50.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |