Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2120 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-2120 is 372 days older than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i3-2120 - $31.32 vs $54.84
- Up to 42% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-2120 - $0.11 vs $0.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-6200 - 319 vs 317 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |