Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1772 days newer than the more expensive FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 5 than FX-6200 - 163 vs 162 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than FX-6200 - $28.52 vs $31.32
- Up to 10% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than FX-6200 - $0.19 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |