Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 3705 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - $31.32 vs $236.17
- Up to 81% better value when playing Dota 2 than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - $0.21 vs $1.13 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 41% better in Dota 2 than FX-6200 - 233 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
233
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
18%
Price, €
€262.15
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €262.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |