Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 138 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
