Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2823 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 42% better in FIFA 23 than FX-6200 - 129 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
129
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €42.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Athlon |
Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |