Buy on Amazon
€34.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $55
Availability
MSRP in USD: $55
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2383 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 39% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $31.32 vs $51.17
- Up to 33% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Athlon 200GE - $0.16 vs $0.24 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 5% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-6200 - 234 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
MovoLs Hexa-Core CPU Processor Compatible with FX Series FX-6200 FX 6200 3.8 GHz FD6200FRW6KGU Socket AM3+ Improve Computer Running Speed
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
AMD YD200GC6FBBOX Athlon 200GE 2-Core 4-Thread AM4 Socket Desktop Processor with Radeon Vega Graphics
Buy for €56.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Athlon |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.