Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2750 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $21.68 vs $488.0
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-6100 - 179 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Buy for €541.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |