Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4471 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $21.68 vs $423.33
- Up to 86% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-14900 - $0.11 vs $0.81 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 158% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6100 - 583 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
226
38.76500857632933%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
583
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
13.580246913580247%
Price, €
€469.9
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €469.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |