Buy on Amazon
€24.06
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $589
Availability
MSRP in USD: $589
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $21.68 vs $277.78
- Up to 91% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-13900K - $0.21 vs $2.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 18% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-6100 - 137 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
116
84.67153284671532%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.06
100%
Value Winner
for AMD CPU FX Series FX-6100 Six Core CPU 3.3GHz Socket AM3+ Processor
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1871 minutes ago
Core i9-13900K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.25/FPS
9.333333333333332%
Price, €
€308.34
7%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-13900K Desktop Processor 24 (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) with Integrated Graphics - Unlocked
Buy for €308.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1882 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i9-13900K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 6 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.