Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1693 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - $21.68 vs $65.81
- Up to 63% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-6800K - $0.21 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6100 - 129 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
117
90.69767441860465%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5605 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
129
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
36.8421052631579%
Price, €
€73.05
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5609 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |