Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2645 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $21.68 vs $58.5
- Up to 60% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i5-9400F - $0.17 vs $0.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Saints Row than FX-6100 - 161 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
145
90.06211180124224%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
39.53488372093024%
Price, €
€64.93
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €64.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |