Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 1311 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-5675C - $21.68 vs $65.81
- Up to 62% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-5675C - $0.2 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 16% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-6100 - 140 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
121
86.42857142857143%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3837 minutes ago
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
38.46153846153847%
Price, €
€73.05
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3840 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |