Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2500K outperforms the more expensive FX-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2500K is 276 days older than the more expensive FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 4 than FX-6100 - 299 vs 295 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than FX-6100 - $18.27 vs $21.68
- Up to 12% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than FX-6100 - $0.07 vs $0.08 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
295
98.66220735785953%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
87.50000000000001%
Price, €
€24.06
84%
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
299
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €20.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |