Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 2185 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $21.68 vs $98.71
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-8100 - $0.17 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than FX-6100 - 150 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 225 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
23.287671232876715%
Price, €
€109.57
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €109.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |