Key Differences
In short — Core i3-560 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-560 is 409 days older than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-6100 - 116 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |