Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3758 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6100 - 205 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €77.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |