Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - $21.68 vs $83.34
- Up to 67% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i3-12100 - $0.12 vs $0.36 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 28% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-6100 - 259 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
202
77.99227799227799%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
33.33333333333333%
Price, €
€92.51
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €92.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |