Buy on Amazon
€24.06
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2365 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 45% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $21.68 vs $39.15
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in New World than FX-6100 - 100 vs 97 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
for AMD CPU FX Series FX-6100 Six Core CPU 3.3GHz Socket AM3+ Processor
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75055 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75054 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.