Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2966 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $21.68 vs $355.32
- Up to 93% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.1 vs $1.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than FX-6100 - 280 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 32 vs 6 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
249
88.92857142857142%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
7.092198581560284%
Price, €
€394.41
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for €394.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |