Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 367 days older than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
