Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1564 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Death Stranding than FX-4350 - 222 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€664.96
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €664.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76749 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |