Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-4300 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-4300 is 1020 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 1% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Pentium G6950 - 223 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Pentium G6950 - $0.17 vs $0.18 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 1% cheaper than FX-4300 - $34.71 vs $35.11
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
223
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.97
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12846 minutes ago
Buy for €38.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12845 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |