Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1987 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $35.11 vs $218.59
- Up to 55% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-8700T - $0.7 vs $1.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 180% better in League of Legends than FX-4300 - 157 vs 56 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19189 minutes ago
Buy for €242.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |