Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3930K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3930K is 344 days older than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - $35.11 vs $204.73
- Up to 82% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-3930K - $0.11 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 95 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than FX-4300 - 377 vs 370 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
370
98.14323607427056%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
377
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
18.333333333333336%
Price, €
€227.25
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €227.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |