Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $35.11 vs $153.55
- Up to 75% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-10700F - $0.31 vs $1.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-4300 - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
127
92.7007299270073%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2679 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
25%
Price, €
€170.44
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2685 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |