Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - $35.11 vs $87.02
- Up to 3% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i5-7400 - $0.7 vs $0.72 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 141% better in League of Legends than FX-4300 - 135 vs 56 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
56
41.48148148148148%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5739 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
97.22222222222221%
Price, €
€96.59
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €96.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5742 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |