Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $35.11 vs $103.41
- Up to 63% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10600K - $0.26 vs $0.71 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-4300 - 161 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
36%
Price, €
€114.78
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €114.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |