Buy on Amazon
€38.97
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1149
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2821 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $35.11 vs $950.54
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 24% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-4300 - 134 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 3.8 GHz 4 MB Cache Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4300WMW4MHK Socket AM3+
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76170 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€1055.1
3%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-core, 32-thread desktop processor
Buy for €1,055.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Castle Peak |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.