Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2589 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $35.11 vs $355.32
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 35% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-4300 - 596 vs 443 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76966 minutes ago
Buy for €394.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76966 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |