Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700G is 3094 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700G - $35.11 vs $116.26
- Up to 65% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 5700G - $0.21 vs $0.6 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4300 - 214 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
190
88.78504672897196%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Buy for €129.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Cezanne |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |