Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4300 and the more expensive FX-8320 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 36% cheaper than FX-8320 - $35.11 vs $54.71
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76567 minutes ago
Buy for €60.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76567 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |