Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-4300 is 239 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 5% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than FX-6200 - 39 vs 37 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 11% cheaper than FX-4300 - $31.32 vs $35.11
- Up to 6% better value when playing Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than FX-4300 - $0.94 vs $1.0 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10823 minutes ago
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10823 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |