Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2244 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $38.04 vs $280.05
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 21% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-4130 - 181 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €42.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
Buy for €310.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |