Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4068 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $38.04 vs $547.66
- Up to 91% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-14900K - $0.26 vs $3.02 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 24% better in God of War than FX-4130 - 201 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
FPS
162
80.59701492537313%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57555 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.02/FPS
8.609271523178808%
Price, €
€607.9
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for €607.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57555 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |