Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3417 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $38.04 vs $263.92
- Up to 77% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i9-12900F - $0.35 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 60% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-4130 - 193 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
FPS
121
62.69430051813472%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
23.026315789473685%
Price, €
€292.95
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €292.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |