Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 2244 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - $16.76 vs $193.04
- Up to 90% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-9700K - $0.11 vs $1.11 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4130 - 193 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Buy for €214.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |