Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1373 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $38.04 vs $87.75
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 26% better in Dirt 5 than FX-4130 - 174 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €42.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |