Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4151 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $38.04 vs $253.6
- Up to 83% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-14700F - $0.25 vs $1.44 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-4130 - 195 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 28 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €42.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Buy for €281.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |