Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2244 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $38.04 vs $91.4
- Up to 56% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-9600K - $0.24 vs $0.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Stray than FX-4130 - 186 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 6 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
FPS
176
94.6236559139785%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
186
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
43.636363636363626%
Price, €
€101.45
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |